There is just no way around it. Marijuana is illegal and alcohol isn't. How can a society be so blind to the truth
that we make deadly decisions and die, while better alternatives exist? The
facts are the real crux to this argument.
We know that alcohol is
toxic, so much so that we've gone to great lengths to make laws that protect us
from ourselves while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage. We see each night the death toll rise from
alcohol-related incidents via our nightly news broadcast. We read
about our neighbors, celebrities, associates, and even (heart-breakingly) our
friends and family dying of alcohol consumption. We hear
the anecdotal evidence, and yet we continue to condone the use of alcohol.
I have to believe, I MUST believe that this is only a case of
misinformation, because there is no logical argument, barring social
engineering, that makes sense of a world where we promote a drug that kills
tens of thousands each year while keeping a completely non-toxic alternative
illegal.
Facts
- Deaths caused per year:
Alcohol induced - 23,199 (source:http://www.drugwarfacts.org)
Marijuana - 0
- Toxic deaths per year (deaths only from the direct consumption of a substance):
Alcohol
- 331 (source: http://www.cdc.gov)
Marijuana
- 0
- Ratio of a fatal dose to an effective dose (how much does it take to get drunk vs. how much it takes to die):
Alcohol - 10 (source: http://www.saferchoice.org)
Marijuana - unable to determine
"The
acute toxicity of cannabinoids is very low. There are no confirmed published cases worldwide of human deaths from
cannabis poisoning." (source: http://www.ukcia.org/research/AdverseEffectsOfCannabis.pdf)
- Number of patients admitted per year for dependence to:
Alcohol -73,000 (source: http://www.mercurynews.com)
Marijuana - less than 200
- Percent of rape and sexual assault attributed to:
Alcohol
- 26.8% (Source: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov)
The Argument
There is no reason to keep marijuana illegal while we promote alcohol as the
correct course of action for recreational use.
It is still amazing that given the choice, using marijuana or drinking a
shot of alcohol, that alcohol pans out as the socially acceptable choice. It's as obvious as a Jim Crow Law how wrong
it is, but as with Jim Crow Laws people were willing to accept the ignorance of
the law to adhere to the status-quo.
Unfounded opinion is what created the Jim Crow Laws just as unfounded opinion
is what created our current (federal) marijuana policy. It is hard in the argument, at this point,
not to delve into a historical discussion of how marijuana became illegal, the
best course then is to put the source on your screen and hope you feel the need
to self-educate by clicking the link (Marijuana History)
Societal Pressure and Child Rearing |
Even the wording used in the propaganda to enact our earliest Marijuana Laws
sounds like it came right out of Jim Crow's memoir,
"... 'Marijuana Madness' is the
belief to which the use of marijuana by colored people is said to cause
excessive sex and violence, and threatens the safety of white women and
children." (Source: marijuanatoday.com)
Other Notable Arguments that
helped enact our CURRENT marijuana laws:
o
1920s: “Makes
darkies think they’re as good as white men.” —H.J. Anslinger, Bureau of
Narcotics
o
1930: “Marihuana is responsible for the raping of white women by crazed negroes.”
—Hearst Newspapers Nationwide
o
1932: “Hasheesh
goads users to blood lust.” —Hearst Newspapers
o
1935: “Marihuana
influenced negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men’s
shadows, and look at a white woman twice.” —Hearst Newspapers
o
1937: “Marihuana
is the most violent drug in the history of mankind.” —Congressional
Testimony, H.J. Anslinger, FBN
... and this is a truncated list.
Why do we promote our freedom and open-mindedness when we obviously have an issue making (or unmaking) the right choice? If you had a gun that could kill 23 thousand people a year... well you would have a pretty good argument for that gun, but if you have a car that holds the same statistic, isn't it then obvious that you shouldn't buy that car? Isn't it even more obvious when someone offers you an alternative that knocks that number down to 0 (or even nearer to 0)?
We were able to abolish the Jim Crow Laws because we knew they were wrong, we heard others echo our feelings, we saw the injustice, and we read the results of our inaction. We continued to reform our laws and allow for minorities an equal measure to enjoy life and pursue liberty and happiness, so why did we stop before we addressed marijuana? It's just silly.
Oh, Homer *sigh* |
Conclusion
This was a hard article to write. It seems almost any approach taken sounds
widely biased. I'm not particularly
biased on the issue but the more I research our choice of recreational chemical
I realize there are so many glaring double standards. It is often said, "We
are not a society of critical thinkers" and every drunk-driver report on
the nightly news reinforces this assumption.
So why even bother? Why write an article that will clearly task society
to use critical thought when most don't even know HOW to critically think? It must be gumption, presumptuousness, and an
inherent belief that critical thinking and solution-based problem solving are
rooted in the human genome. I believe...
I have to believe, that America
has had the wool pulled over its eyes.
If we, as a society, don't have the blinders on then we are lost.
Critical thinking is not just some ghostly
notion, or some novel approach to looking at issues. Critical thinking is the
way we have survived and prospered throughout history. Without this educational tool we will falter
in the coming years, as our technology expands and our ability to communicate
with other sides of the globe becomes as difficult as talking to someone in the
room. At that point in time, is it really justifiable to cling to a social system that promotes a deadly poison as a recreational activity and keeps marijuana illegal?
Just changing your perspective to a informed perspective is enough. This isn't a call to action, just a call for critical thinking. Just being knowledgeable is enough. At this point in time, in this day and age, ignorance is not an argument it is the promotion of a disease.
No comments:
Post a Comment